ZTNA vs. ZTAA vs. ZTA: Which One Should You Choose?

Cyolo Team

Cyolo Team

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on whatsapp
Share on pinterest
ZTA Vs. ZTNA

Zero Trust security provides your employees, partners and contractors with secure access to your network. By managing access through identities and devices and not through networks and transitive trust, actors are constantly validated and bad actors are denied access to your crown jewels. Zero Trust architecture has a number of different security models: ZTNA, ZTAA and ZTA. It’s important to understand the differences between them, because they will determine the level of protection of your network as well as your security posture. This blog post will explain each one and help you understand which solution is best suited to answer your security needs.

What is ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access)?

ZTNA (Zero Trust Network Access) is the most widely used implementation of the Zero Trust model and what most people think of when they hear “Zero Trust”. Also dubbed “software-defined perimeter (SDP)”, ZTNA architecture grants users access to assets and systems in the network only after they have been verified and authenticated.

ZTNA is based on micro-segmentation and isolation of networks. It is a VPN replacement, enabling secure access of users from different locations and devices without being dependent on corporate networks. In this era of remote work, ZTNA is a good solution for CISOs and IT managers who need to find a quick an simple solution for their employees

A common ZTNA model will look like this. As you can see, the cloud broker sends all users and devices, no matter if they originated from the external or internal network, to get authenticated before providing access.

ZTNA Cloud Broker

 

ZTNA Advantages:

  • Blocks hackers that could previously access systems and inject malware once they entered the perimeter.
  • Replaces VPNs, especially during the remote work era
  • Provides secures access from external networks

 

ZTNA Disadvantages:

  • Does not protect apps
  • Requires trusting the ZTNA provider
  • Does not secure access from offline and closed networks like OT, SAP and ERP

For more information, read our blog post “7 Questions to Ask When Choosing Your ZTNA Provider”.

 

What is ZTAA (Zero Trust Application Access)?

 

While ZTNA protects the network, applications are left vulnerable. This is where ZTAA comes on. ZTAA operates according to the same Zero Trust principles like ZTNA. However, it assumes all networks are compromised and opens up access to applications only after users and devices are authenticated. 

 

ZTAA Advantages:

  • Blocks hackers that enter the network
  • Protects apps

 

ZTAA Disadvantages:

  • Requires trusting the ZTAA provider
  • Does not secure access from offline and closed networks like OT, SAP and ERP

 

What is ZTA (Zero Trust Access)?

 

Zero Trust Access (ZTA) is a method that provides end-to-end zero trust, across all networks, apps, systems data centers and the rest of the architecture components. Based solely on identity-based access, true Zero Trust is not bound to specific networks or platforms. Therefore, it provides complete zero trust across the entire organizational architecture, even for unique and offline networks like the industrial floor or ERP.

 

ZTA encompasses ZTNA and ZTA, but provides a pure Zero Trust approach. Not only is it completely identity based, it also applies the approach to the provider itself. A ZTA provider does not require the user to trust it all.

 

While ZTNA and ZTAA providers access the organization’s data so they can validate access to it, a true zero trust provider does not have any visibility into the organization. This is especially valuable for organizations that value their data privacy.

 

A ZTA model will look like this:

 

Zero Trust Network

 

As you can see, no inbound network traffic is allowed. All the customer data and secrets are kept in the component that resides in the organizational secure environment and are not accessible even to the ZT provider. This includes the policies and password vault that are also signed by the customers keys (certificates) and are not visible to anyone.

 

ZTA Advantages:

  • Blocks hackers that try to access any part of the network architecture
  • Covers all networks and protocols
  • The ZT provides does not have access to the customer data – no data leaves the network

 

ZTA Disadvantages:

  • Requires changing the organizational approach to VPNs and networks

 

 

Zero Trust Comparison Table

ZTNA Vs. ZTA Vs. ZTAA

The shift in organization network architecture requires quick adoption of new security methods. Zero Trust is a convenient VPN replacement, adjusted to today’s world where users are connecting across the globe from multiple devices. When choosing a Zero Trust solution, CISOs, CIOs and IT Managers can decide to secure the network (ZTNA), applications (ZTAA) or their complete architecture (ZTA).

Cyolo provides a true Zero Trust solution for networks, applications, systems and all the organization’s unique needs, from ERPs to industrial floors. Cyolo is compatible with any network topology and identity infrastructure. In addition, Cyolo does not have access to the organization data. Not only does this ensure true privacy and security, it also improves performance as less encryptions are taking place. Request a demo to learn more.

Subscribe to our Blog

Get the latest posts in your email
Zero Trust Whitepaper

5 Things to Consider Before Adopting a Zero Trust Strategy

highlights3

Can You Trust Your Zero Trust Provider?

Subscribe to our Blog

Subscribe to our Blog

Get the latest posts in your email